Food Security in the Long-Run:A Macroeconomic Approach to Land Use Policy
Pedro Naso; Ozgun Haznedar; Bruno Lanz; Timothy Swanson
Authors registered in the RePEc Author Service: Timothy Swanson,
Pedro Naso and
Bruno Lanz
No 71-2021, CIES Research Paper series from Centre for International Environmental Studies, The Graduate Institute
Abstract:
It is important to dedicate substantial parts of the global land supply to public good uses in the 21st century, for purposes of climate change management and biodiversity provision. But will it also be possible to meet the food requirements of 12 billion people while doing so? Using a macroeconomic model (MAVA), we demonstrate that it may be possible to provide both for food security and environmental services in the long run. We first show that it may be possible to provide for food security with very substantial constraints on the amount of land used in agriculture with relatively minor welfare losses. We then show that global policies that reallocate labour across sectors of the economy may have the capacity for directing the economy toward reduced reliance on land in agriculture. Focusing on education, research and development, and fertility costs may be the best way to meet these combined goals.
Pages: 34 pages
Date: 2021-12-14
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-agr and nep-env
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://repec.graduateinstitute.ch/pdfs/ciesrp/CIES_RP_71.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gii:ciesrp:cies_rp_71
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in CIES Research Paper series from Centre for International Environmental Studies, The Graduate Institute Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Kristine Kjeldsen ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).