The Effect of Ambiguity on Status Quo Bias: An Experimental Study

Amnon Maltz and Giorgia Romagnoli

No WP2015/5, Working Papers from University of Haifa, Department of Economics

Abstract: We conduct an experiment to determine the effect of ambiguity on status quo bias. We find no evidence of the bias in the absence of ambiguity and when ambiguity is present both in the status quo option and the alternative. We do find evidence for status quo bias under asymmetric presence of ambiguity, i.e. when the status quo option is non-ambiguous and the alternative is, or when the status quo option is ambiguous and the alternative is not. These findings are not predicted by the existing models of choice with initial endowment, such as the loss aversion model by Kahneman and Tversky (1979) and the incomplete preferences model by Bewley (1986). Our results, combined with the evidence from the endowment effect literature, suggest that dissimilarity between options may be an important determinant of the status quo bias.

Keywords: Status Quo Bias; Risk; Ambiguity; Reference Effects. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C91 D11 D81 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 25
Date: 2015-10-20
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cbe, nep-exp and nep-upt
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hevra.haifa.ac.il/econ/wp_files/wp201505.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:haf:huedwp:wp201505

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from University of Haifa, Department of Economics 199 Aba Khoushy Ave., Mount Carmel, Haifa, Israel, 3498838. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Anna Rubinchik ().