Economic freedom in Muslim countries: an explanation using the theory of institutional path dependency

François Facchini (facchini@univ-paris1.fr)
Additional contact information
François Facchini: CES - Centre d'économie de la Sorbonne - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique

Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) from HAL

Abstract: This article explains the level of economic freedom in Muslim countries through the theory of institutional path dependency. Islamic countries are generally not free and they have a poor record regarding property rights. To explain these realities we use the institutional history of Muslim countries. We define three steps: the Arab and Ottoman Empires when Islamic law was of great importance, European colonisation, and the contemporary era with its movement towards a revival of Islam. Islamic law is not liberal. This explain why in general Muslim countries are not free. Colonisation radically changed institutional life in the twentieth century. British colonisation proved to be better than did French or Soviet colonisation. This explains why the Persian Gulf countries are freer. The collapse of the Soviet model explains the speed of liberalisation in former socialist countries (such as Albania, Kyrgyz Republic, and Kazakhstan). Nevertheless, the twentieth century was not just the century of Westernisation. It was also the century of the revival of Islam. The article concludes that the history of the twentieth century does not explain the way in which Muslim countries are attracted by the ideal of the Muslim city. The revival of Islamic intellectual innovations and the evolution of Muslim opinion sustain this thesis. Therefore, there is a dependency on the past and on an imagined future. Islam acts, like yesterday, on the world of institutional possibilities.

Keywords: Economic freedom; Colonisation; Property rights; Islam; Imaginary (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013-08
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ara, nep-cwa and nep-his
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-00636998
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

Published in European Journal of Law and Economics, 2013, 36 (1), pp.139-167. ⟨10.1007/s10657-011-9250-y⟩

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-00636998/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:cesptp:hal-00636998

DOI: 10.1007/s10657-011-9250-y

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD (hal@ccsd.cnrs.fr).