EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Delaying the introduction of emissions trading systems—Implications for power plant investment and operation from a multi-stage decision model

Jian-Lei Mo, Joachim Schleich, Lei Zhu and Ying Fan
Additional contact information
Jian-Lei Mo: Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research, Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research, Institute of Policy and Management - CAS - Chinese Academy of Sciences [Changchun Branch]
Ying Fan: School of Economics & Management - BUAA - Beihang University

Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) from HAL

Abstract: Relying on real options theory, we employ a multistage decision model to analyze the effect of delaying the introduction of emission trading systems (ETS) on power plant investments in carbon capture and storage (CCS) retrofits, on plant operation, and on carbon dioxide (CO2) abatement. Unlike previous studies, we assume that the investment decision is made before the ETS is in place, and we allow CCS operating flexibility for new power plant investments. Thus, the plant may be run in CCS-off mode if carbon prices are low. We employ Monte Carlo simulation methods to account for uncertainties in the prices of CO2 certificates, other inputs, and output prices, relying on a realistic parameterization for a supercritical pulverized coal plant in China. We find that CCS operating flexibility lowers the critical carbon price needed to support CCS investment because it renders CCS investment less irreversible. For a low carbon price path, operating flexibility also implies that delaying the introduction of an ETS hardly affects plant CO2 abatement since the plant operator is better off purchasing emission certificates rather than operating the plant in CCS mode. Interestingly, for low carbon prices we find a U-shaped relation between the length of the delay and the economic value of the plant. Thus, delaying the introduction of an ETS may make investors worse off.

Keywords: power plant investment; regulatory uncertainty; multistage decision; operating flexibility; real options theory; emissions trading; CCS; China (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015-11
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ene and nep-env
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://grenoble-em.hal.science/hal-01265934v1
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (15)

Published in Energy Economics, 2015, 52, pp.255-264. ⟨10.1016/j.eneco.2015.11.009⟩

Downloads: (external link)
https://grenoble-em.hal.science/hal-01265934v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Delaying the introduction of emissions trading systems—Implications for power plant investment and operation from a multi-stage decision model (2015) Downloads
Working Paper: Delaying the introduction of emissions trading systems—Implications for power plant investment and operation from a multi-stage decision model (2015) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:gemptp:hal-01265934

DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2015.11.009

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-22
Handle: RePEc:hal:gemptp:hal-01265934