Compliant sinners, obstinate saints: How power and self-focus determine the effectiveness of social influences in ethical decision making
Marko Pitesa () and
Stefan Thau ()
Additional contact information
Marko Pitesa: EESC-GEM Grenoble Ecole de Management
Stefan Thau: LBS - London Business School - London Business School
Post-Print from HAL
Abstract:
In this research, we examine when and why organizational environments influence how employees respond to moral issues. Past research proposed that social influences in organizations affect employees' ethical decision making, but did not explain when and why some individuals are affected by the organizational environment and some disregard it. To address this problem, we drew on research on power to propose that power makes people more self-focused, which, in turn, makes them more likely to act upon their preferences and ignore (un)ethical social influences. Using both experimental and field methods, we tested our model across the three main paradigms of social influence: informational influence (Study 1 and 2), normative influence (Study 3), and compliance (Study 4). Results offer converging evidence for our theory.
Keywords: ethical decision making; power; social influences; self-focus (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013-06-03
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cdm, nep-exp and nep-hrm
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: http://hal.grenoble-em.com/hal-00814614v2
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (24)
Published in Academy of Management Journal, 2013, 56 (3), pp.635-658. ⟨10.5465/amj.2011.0891⟩
Downloads: (external link)
http://hal.grenoble-em.com/hal-00814614v2/document (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00814614
DOI: 10.5465/amj.2011.0891
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().