How individuals cope with institutional complexity in organizations: a case study in the energy transition

Virginie Svenningsen (), Eva Boxenbaum () and Davide Ravasi ()
Additional contact information
Virginie Svenningsen: CGS i3 - Centre de Gestion Scientifique i3 - Mines Paris - PSL (École nationale supérieure des mines de Paris) - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - I3 - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Eva Boxenbaum: Copenhagen Business School - CBS - Copenhagen Business School [Copenhagen], CGS i3 - Centre de Gestion Scientifique i3 - Mines Paris - PSL (École nationale supérieure des mines de Paris) - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - I3 - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Davide Ravasi: Cass Business School - City University London

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: The present article examines how employees cope with an organizational setting that is institutionally complex. The empirical setting is a French energy corporation that simultaneously pursues a logic of science and a logic of market through multiple research partnerships with public and private actors engaged in the energy transition. We draw on the literature on institutional logics and hybrid organizations to examine how employees of this French energy corporation deal with this institutionally complex environment. Our findings point to three strategies that individuals use to cope with institutional complexity in their organizational setting: aggregating, selective coupling and compartmentalizing. Each individual uses only one strategy. The findings further suggest three psychological factors that seem to explain which of these strategies a given individual adopts for coping with institutional complexity: tolerance for ambiguity, preference for holism, and preference for reductionism. We integrate these findings into a two-dimensional model. These findings contribute to illuminating how individuals cope with institutional complexity in their organizational setting, an insight that can help shed light on why organizations respond somewhat differently to the same institutionally complex field.

Keywords: Institutional complexity; multiple institutional logics; hybrid organizations; energy transition. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016-07-07
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ene, nep-reg and nep-sog
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://minesparis-psl.hal.science/hal-01336318v1
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Published in 32nd EGOS Colloquium (EGOS 2016), Jul 2016, Naples, Italy

Downloads: (external link)
https://minesparis-psl.hal.science/hal-01336318v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01336318

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().