Comment les individus évaluent l'engagement pour une cause légitime ?

Clarisse Vermes ()
Additional contact information
Clarisse Vermes: CORHIS - Communication, Ressources Humaines et Intervention Sociale - UPVM - Université Paul-Valéry - Montpellier 3 - UPVD - Université de Perpignan Via Domitia, MRM - Montpellier Research in Management - UPVM - Université Paul-Valéry - Montpellier 3 - UPVD - Université de Perpignan Via Domitia - Groupe Sup de Co Montpellier (GSCM) - Montpellier Business School - UM - Université de Montpellier

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: This communication shows how operationalizing the theory of Economies of Worth (Boltanski and Thevenot, 1991) to study how people judge the legitimacy of an action. This methodological approach would, in our view, be appropriate to the quantitative study of the relationship between judgments of the legitimacy of a situation, and commitments into action.

Keywords: Survey; data collection; quantitative analysis; Economies of Worth; scenario method; Economie de la grandeur; méthode des scénarios; Enquête; collecte de données; étude quantitative (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015-06-02
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-hpe
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-01337985v1
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Colloque Science & You 2015 - Journées Hubert Curien, Université de Lorraine, Jun 2015, Nancy, France

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-01337985v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01337985

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().