Entrepreneurial Orientation: do we actually know as much as we think we do?

Kathleen Randerson
Additional contact information
Kathleen Randerson: Audencia Business School

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: The focus of this paper is on firm-level entrepreneurial behaviours and the processes that lead to them, known as Entrepreneurial Orientation. Despite the popularity of this construct, we argue that extant EO research suffers from major limitations linked to definitional inconsistencies and measurement issues. We present five distinct conceptualizations of EO in order to frame further research in the positivist mode. Moreover, we show that to gain a holistic and robust understanding of firm-level entrepreneurship, works from other research traditions and philosophies of science are needed. In this respect, the European research tradition and its wide variety of fields of research and research methods can offer a contextualized view of firm-level entrepreneurial behaviours and processes. Works embedded in the social constructionist philosophy of science might also offer an understanding of how, when, and why actors of different levels act do so and the likely outcomes of these actions as well as the interplay and divergence among these actors and levels. Works embedded in the pragmatic approach, illustrated by effectuation, could also contribute to a holistic understanding of the phenomenon. Finally, we call for researchers to be attentive to the need to align their conceptualizations, research methods and philosophies of science.

Keywords: Corporate entrepreneurship; Firm-level entrepreneurial behaviour; Entrepreneurial Orientation; Critique; European research tradition; Constructionism; Pragmatism (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016-09
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-sbm
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://audencia.hal.science/hal-01392200v1
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8)

Published in Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 2016, 28 (7-8), pp.580 - 600. ⟨10.1080/08985626.2016.1221230⟩

Downloads: (external link)
https://audencia.hal.science/hal-01392200v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01392200

DOI: 10.1080/08985626.2016.1221230

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().