DEA and SFA research on the efficiency of microfinance institutions: A meta-analysis

François-Seck Fall (), Al-mouksit Akim and Harouna Wassongma
Additional contact information
François-Seck Fall: LEREPS - Laboratoire d'Etude et de Recherche sur l'Economie, les Politiques et les Systèmes Sociaux - UT Capitole - Université Toulouse Capitole - UT - Université de Toulouse - UT2J - Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès - UT - Université de Toulouse - Institut d'Études Politiques [IEP] - Toulouse - ENSFEA - École Nationale Supérieure de Formation de l'Enseignement Agricole de Toulouse-Auzeville
Harouna Wassongma: UCAD - Université Cheikh Anta Diop de Dakar [Sénégal]

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Microfinance has played a key role in the fight against exclusion and the promotion of entrepreneurship in developing countries. An important question today is how to increase the reach and profitability of microfinance, in a context where subsidies are withdrawing to promote the viability and sustainability of microfinance institutions (MFIs). Efficiency analysis has found favor in this context and has attracted growing interest among professionals, partners, and researchers. Abundant empirical work has been conducted over the last ten years on this subject, in very different contexts and with different methodologies. The purpose of this article is to provide a meta-regression analysis on parametric and nonparametric estimations of Mean Technical Efficiency (MTE) in microfinance, using a data set of 262 observations from 38 studies. The results show that, in the microfinance industry, MTE scores have increased over time. However, with an MTE rate of approximately 61.1%, there is room for improving efficiency. MFIs use more resources than necessary for the results achieved in terms of outreach and revenue generated. Our results show heterogeneity of MTE according to the methodological approach of the studies. Studies with a larger number of variables (inputs and outputs) produced higher MTE scores than did those with a smaller number of variables. Studies using the variable returns to scale assumption resulted in higher MTE scores than those using constant returns to scale. In addition, those with a production approach had higher MTEs than did those using the intermediation approach, while studies of a large number of MFIs had lower scores than did those involving a small sample size. Moreover, research estimating social efficiency generated lower MTEs compared to those estimating financial efficiency. Studies using data from African MFIs obtained lower MTEs than did those on MFIs in Latin America and MENA, which confirms the poor performance of African microfinance.

Keywords: DEA; SFA; Meta-analysis; Microfinance; Technical efficiency (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018-07
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-eff and nep-mfd
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://univ-tlse2.hal.science/hal-01794625v1
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (30)

Published in World Development, 2018, 107, pp.176 - 188. ⟨10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.02.032⟩

Downloads: (external link)
https://univ-tlse2.hal.science/hal-01794625v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: DEA and SFA research on the efficiency of microfinance institutions: A meta-analysis (2018)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01794625

DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.02.032

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().