EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Lump-sum vs. energy-efficiency subsidy recycling of carbon tax revenue in the residential sector: A French assessment

Recyclage des revenus de la taxe carbone en paiements forfaitaires vs. subventions à l'efficacité énergétique: Une évaluation pour le secteur résidentiel français

Cyril Bourgeois, Louis-Gaëtan Giraudet () and Philippe Quirion
Additional contact information
Louis-Gaëtan Giraudet: CIRED - Centre International de Recherche sur l'Environnement et le Développement - Cirad - Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - AgroParisTech - ENPC - École nationale des ponts et chaussées - Université Paris-Saclay - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Empirical evidence suggests that carbon taxes are best accepted when their revenue is used to finance abatement measures. This revenue recycling option has however received little attention in modelling assessments. With the aim of filling this gap, we assess the impact of the French carbon tax on energy use for residential heating and compare the cost-effectiveness and distributional impacts of two revenue recycling options: lump-sum payment and subsidies for home energy retrofits. We do so using Res-IRF, an energy-economy model that provides a highly detailed description of housing features (single vs. multi-family, energy efficiency, heating fuel) and key household characteristics (tenancy status, income). We find that the two recycling options offset the regressive impacts of the tax in comparable ways. Lump-sum recycling is particularly effective in reducing inequalities between owner-occupiers and tenants. In turn, subsidy recycling saves energy and increases comfort more cost-effectively. In the discussion, we further point to some advantages of subsidy recycling from both a political and administrative perspective.

Keywords: carbon tax; revenue-recycling; building sector; fuel poverty; energy efficiency subsidies (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ene, nep-env and nep-reg
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://enpc.hal.science/hal-02073964v2
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (14)

Published in Ecological Economics, 2021, ⟨10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107006⟩

Downloads: (external link)
https://enpc.hal.science/hal-02073964v2/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Lump-sum vs. energy-efficiency subsidy recycling of carbon tax revenue in the residential sector: A French assessment (2021) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02073964

DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107006

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-24
Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02073964