Are trading invariants really invariant? Trading costs matter
Frédéric Bucci,
Fabrizio Lillo,
Jean-Philippe Bouchaud () and
Michael Benzaquen ()
Additional contact information
Michael Benzaquen: LadHyX - Laboratoire d'hydrodynamique - X - École polytechnique - IP Paris - Institut Polytechnique de Paris - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Post-Print from HAL
Abstract:
We revisit the trading invariance hypothesis recently proposed by Kyle and Obizhaeva [1] by empirically investigating a large dataset of bets, or metaorders, provided by ANcerno. The hypothesis predicts that the quantity I := R/N 3/2 , where R is the exchanged risk (volatility × volume × price) and N is the number of bets, is invariant. We find that the 3/2 scaling between R and N works well and is robust against changes of year, market capitalisation and economic sector. However our analysis clearly shows that I is not invariant. We find a very high correlation R 2 > 0.8 between I and the total trading cost (spread and market impact) of the bet. We propose new invariants defined as a ratio of I and costs and find a large decrease in variance. We show that the small dispersion of the new invariants is mainly driven by (i) the scaling of the spread with the volatility per transaction, (ii) the near invariance of the distribution of metaorder size and of the volume and number fractions of bets across stocks.
Date: 2020
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-mst
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-02323318
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Published in Quantitative Finance, 2020
Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-02323318/document (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02323318
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().