Citizen Advisory Committees: A Tool to Remedy the Shortcomings of the Contingent Valuation Method Within the System of Multi-Level Governance
Philippe Bance and
Angélique Chassy ()
Additional contact information
Angélique Chassy: CREAM - Centre de Recherche en Economie Appliquée à la Mondialisation - UNIROUEN - Université de Rouen Normandie - NU - Normandie Université - IRIHS - Institut de Recherche Interdisciplinaire Homme et Société - UNIROUEN - Université de Rouen Normandie - NU - Normandie Université
Post-Print from HAL
Abstract:
The Contingent Valuation Method (CVM) is an economic analysis tool used to measure, the utility of producing of public goods, based upon individual's declared preferences. The public decision-maker is thus able to arbitrate between the expenditure to be made. The approach has been deployed in a centralist conceptual plan, leaving little room for citizens in the decision-making process and it has been undermined by the rise in power, notably in Europe, of multi-level governance. The decision-maker is no longer alone in this process and public decision-making must operate on the basis of common views adopted by various levels of government that should also establish much stronger links with the citizen-users of public goods. This article analyzes the operational impact of Citizen Advisory Committees (CAC) as participative tools of CVM to resulting in an effective cooperation between the various public actors and the civil society in public decision-making.
Keywords: public management; citizen participation; multilevel governance; individual preferences; monetarisation; public decision (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-env and nep-upt
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.univ-antilles.fr/hal-02910727
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)
Published in International Journal of Public Administration, 2019, 42 (8), pp.685-695. ⟨10.1080/01900692.2018.1500586⟩
Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.univ-antilles.fr/hal-02910727/document (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02910727
DOI: 10.1080/01900692.2018.1500586
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().