‘What’s the evidence?’—Towards more empirical evaluations of the impact of OR interventions in healthcare
Guillaume Lamé (),
Sonya Crowe and
Matthew Barclay
Additional contact information
Guillaume Lamé: CAM - University of Cambridge [UK], THIS.institute - THIS Institute (The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute) - Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge - CAM - University of Cambridge [UK], LGI - Laboratoire Génie Industriel - CentraleSupélec - Université Paris-Saclay
Sonya Crowe: UCL - University College of London [London]
Matthew Barclay: CAM - University of Cambridge [UK], THIS.institute - THIS Institute (The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute) - Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge - CAM - University of Cambridge [UK]
Post-Print from HAL
Abstract:
Despite an increasing number of papers reporting applications of operational research (OR) to problems in healthcare, there remains little empirical evidence of OR improving healthcare delivery in practice. Without such evidence it is harder both to justify the usefulness of OR to a healthcare audience and to learn and continuously improve our approaches. To progress, we need to build the evidence-base on whether and how OR improves healthcare delivery through careful empirical evaluation. This position paper reviews evaluation standards in healthcare improvement research and dispels some common myths about evaluation. It highlights the current lack of robust evaluation of healthcare OR and makes the case for addressing this. It then proposes possible ways for building better empirical evaluations of OR interventions in healthcare.
Keywords: Health Quality and Evaluation; Healthcare Improvement Research; Impact (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-03035075
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Published in Health Systems, 2022, 11 (1), pp.59-67. ⟨10.1080/20476965.2020.1857663⟩
Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-03035075/document (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03035075
DOI: 10.1080/20476965.2020.1857663
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().