Does demand noise matter? Identification and implications
Kenza Benhima and
Céline Poilly ()
Post-Print from HAL
Abstract:
We assess the role of demand noise (excessive optimism or pessimism about demand) together with supply noise (excessive optimism or pessimism about supply). To do so, we propose a methodology to decompose business cycles into supply, demand, supply noise and demand noise shocks, using a structural vector autoregression model. Key to our identification of both supply noise and demand noise is the use of sign restrictions on survey expectation errors about output growth and about inflation. We show that demand-related noise shocks have a negative effect on output and contribute substantially to its fluctuations. Monetary policy and private information seem to play a key role in the transmission of demand noise shocks.
Keywords: business cycle; information friction; noise shock; SVAR with sign restriction (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021-01
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ban and nep-mac
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://amu.hal.science/hal-03173423
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)
Published in Journal of Monetary Economics, 2021, 117, pp.278-295. ⟨10.1016/j.jmoneco.2020.01.006⟩
Downloads: (external link)
https://amu.hal.science/hal-03173423/document (application/pdf)
Related works:
Journal Article: Does demand noise matter? Identification and implications (2021) 
Working Paper: Does demand noise matter? Identification and implications (2020) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03173423
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoneco.2020.01.006
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().