Barriers and motivations for green logistics: A theoretical approach
Freins et motivations de la logistique verte: Approche théorique
Hind Ennaji () and
Mustapha Jaad
Additional contact information
Hind Ennaji: Université Ibn Zohr = Ibn Zohr University [Agadir]
Mustapha Jaad: Université Ibn Zohr = Ibn Zohr University [Agadir]
Post-Print from HAL
Abstract:
In a highly competitive environment, the issue of green logistics is receiving considerable attention. Green supply chain management has become an important organizational philosophy for reducing environmental risk, so it plays an important role in improving business performance. In 1991, the American Logistics Council, a U.S.-based trade organization, defined logistics as: "the process of planning, implementing, and controlling the efficient flow and storage of goods, services, and related information from one point of origin to another" (Council of Logistics Management | Trade Organization, n.d.) Since the application of logistics generally has a positive effect on the efficiency of the supply chain system, it is suggested that logistics should be environmentally friendly, hence the concept of "green logistics". There are many barriers and factors that directly and indirectly affect the implementation of green practices in an organization (at different levels and depending on the level of development of the organization). In this paper, a total number of 27 barriers and 41 drivers are identified from the literature. These Barriers and Drivers are almost common in various sectors for the adoption and implementation of GSCM in companies.
Keywords: Sustainable Development; Green Logistics; Supply Chain Management; Logistique verte; Gestion de la Chaine Logistique; Développement Durable (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-env and nep-isf
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-03313907v1
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Published in International Journal of Accounting, Finance, Auditing, Management and Economics, 2021, 2 (4), pp.459-479. ⟨10.5281/zenodo.5146710⟩
Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-03313907v1/document (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03313907
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5146710
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().