The Revenge of Defaulters. Sovereign Defaults and Interstate Negotiations in the Post-War Financial Order, 1940–65

Juan Flores Zendejas, Pierre Penet and Christian Suter
Additional contact information
Christian Suter: UNINE - Université de Neuchâtel = University of Neuchatel

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: The postwar era holds a special and important place in the long history of sovereign debt disputes. The majority of states suspended interest payments on their foreign obligations after 1931. In 1945, nearly half of all countries representing 40 per cent of the world income were in default (Reinhart & Rogoff, 2009, p. 73; Suter, 1992). Never before had creditors faced a wave of defaults of this magnitude. Previous scholarship has demonstrated that the economic consequences of the Great Depression were the main causes of debt defaults, and the Second World War further delayed the negotiations between borrowers and bondholders in certain cases (Eichengreen, 1991; Eichengreen & Portes, 1989). Less well known, however, are the important changes affecting the actors, tools, and forums governing the settlement of debt disputes. For debtors and creditors, the postwar settlement of debt disputes represented an enormous task not only because of the sheer amount of debt in default but also because old methods of debt settlement no longer applied. The methods that debtors and creditors use to settle debt disputes have greatly varied over time. Since the mid-nineteenth century, bondholder committees had furnished creditors with their most efficient method to protect their rights against recalcitrant states. Bondholder committees derived their authority from the capacity to sponsor market access to preferred customers and to refuse to list new bonds from a creditor in default through stock exchange regulations (Hautcoeur & Riva, 2012; Flandreau, 2013). Yet, when the question of debt repayment resurfaced in 1945, capital markets were virtually shut down. Having abandoned bond markets, states borrowed domestically or through public lending schemes from Export Promotion Agencies and multilateral organizations. Syndicate bank lending emerged as the main source of private external finance, while sovereign bond issuances would not return to prewar levels until the post Brady-plan era of financial globalization. This major shift in the structure of debt financing critically

Date: 2021-03-12
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ban and nep-his
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-03352783
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Published in Pierre Penet; Juan Flores Zendejas. Sovereign Debt Diplomacies. Rethinking Sovereign Debt from Colonial Empires to Hegemony, Oxford University Press, pp.165 - 186, 2021, 9780198866350. ⟨10.1093/oso/9780198866350.003.0008⟩

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-03352783/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03352783

DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198866350.003.0008

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().