Revisiting the location bias and additionality of REDD+ projects: the role of project proponents status and certification

Philippe Delacote, Gwenolé Le Velly and Gabriela Simonet
Additional contact information
Gabriela Simonet: Independent Researcher

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Since the establishment of REDD+, hundreds of projects have emerged around the globe. Much attention has been given to REDD+ projects in the literature, but the conditions under which they are likely to be effective are still not well known. In particular, the location bias concept states that projects are more likely to be implemented in remote areas, where development pressure is low, hence questioning the additionality of these projects. In this article, we examine this concept, assessing how the status of REDD+ project proponents and the project certification influence the choice of location and the project's additionality. Using a sample of six REDD+ projects in Brazil, we show that these two dimensions can impact location choice toward areas with higher or lower opportunity costs and that this choice can impact additionality. We also show that the selection of an area with low opportunity costs, which is frequently presented as a location bias, does not necessarily preclude additionality.

Keywords: Additionality; Conservation policy; Deforestation; Impact evaluation; REDD+; Spatial analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022-02-01
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-agr, nep-env, nep-ppm and nep-ure
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-03467584v1
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Published in Resource and Energy Economics, 2022, 67, ⟨10.1016/j.reseneeco.2021.101277⟩

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-03467584v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Revisiting the location bias and additionality of REDD+ projects: the role of project proponents status and certification (2022)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03467584

DOI: 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2021.101277

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD (hal@ccsd.cnrs.fr).