EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Are firms with different CSR profiles equally innovative? Empirical analysis with survey data

Rachel Bocquet, Christian Le Bas (), Caroline Mothe () and Nicolas Poussing
Additional contact information
Christian Le Bas: GATE - Groupe d'analyse et de théorie économique - UL2 - Université Lumière - Lyon 2 - ENS LSH - Ecole Normale Supérieure Lettres et Sciences Humaines - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: This paper explores the relationship between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and innovation from a firm strategic perspective. Matching Community Innovation Survey data with specific data collected about the CSR behaviour of Luxembourg firms, the authors identify two types of firms (strategic versus responsive) that differ in the intensity of their CSR adoption. A bivariate probit model, estimated to explain the different types of technological innovations (product and/or process), shows that firms with strategic CSR profiles are more likely to innovate in both products and processes. In contrast, adopting responsive CSR practices significantly alters firms' innovation, such that CSR may create barriers to innovation. These results have implications for theory and offer managerial recommendations for firms designing their innovation strategies.

Keywords: Corporate social responsibility; innovation; product; process; strategic profiles (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00737698v1
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (78)

Published in European Management Journal, 2013, 31 (6), pp.642-654. ⟨10.1016/j.emj.2012.07.001⟩

Downloads: (external link)
https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00737698v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Are firms with different CSR profiles equally innovative? Empirical analysis with survey data (2013) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00737698

DOI: 10.1016/j.emj.2012.07.001

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00737698