Using a multi-criteria decision aid methodology to implement sustainable development principles within an Organization

Myriam Merad (), Nicolas Dechy, Lisa Serir (), Michel Grabisch and Frédéric Marcel
Additional contact information
Myriam Merad: INERIS - Institut National de l'Environnement Industriel et des Risques
Nicolas Dechy: INERIS - Institut National de l'Environnement Industriel et des Risques
Lisa Serir: FEMTO-ST - Franche-Comté Électronique Mécanique, Thermique et Optique - Sciences et Technologies (UMR 6174) - UTBM - Université de Technologie de Belfort-Montbeliard - ENSMM - Ecole Nationale Supérieure de Mécanique et des Microtechniques - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - UFC - Université de Franche-Comté - UBFC - Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté [COMUE]
Frédéric Marcel: INERIS - Institut National de l'Environnement Industriel et des Risques

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: The implementation of Sustainable Development (SD) within an Organization is a difficult task. This is due to the fact that it is difficult to deal with conflicting and incommensurable aspects such as environmental, economic and social dimensions. In this paper we have used a Multi-Criteria Decision Aid (MCDA) methodology to cope with these difficulties. MCDA methodology offers the opportunity to avoid monetary valuation of the different dimensions of the SD. These dimensions are not substitutable for one another and all have a role to play. There is an abundance of possible aggregation procedures in MCDA methodology. In this paper we have proposed an innovative method to choose a suitable aggregation procedure for SD problems. Real life case studies of the implementation of an outranking approach (i.e., ELECTRE) and of a mono-criterion synthesis approach (i.e., MAUT approaches based on the Choquet integral) were done to respectively rank 22 SD strategic actions within an expertise Institute and rank 20 practical operational actions to control energy consumption of the Institute's buildings.

Keywords: Sustainable Development indicators; Sustainable Development action plan; Multi-Criteria Decision Aid; ELECTRE; Choquet Integral (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cse, nep-env, nep-ger and nep-ppm
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00752736v1
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8)

Published in European Journal of Operational Research, 2013, pp.603-613. ⟨10.1016/j.ejor.2012.08.019⟩

Downloads: (external link)
https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00752736v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Using a multi-criteria decision aid methodology to implement sustainable development principles within an organization (2013)
Working Paper: Using a multi-criteria decision aid methodology to implement sustainable development principles within an Organization (2013)
Working Paper: Using a multi-criteria decision aid methodology to implement sustainable development principles within an Organization (2013)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00752736

DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2012.08.019

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().