Three cases of identity (re)construction through art interventions: the dialogical and the 'sensible'

Philippe Mairesse (), Rachel Beaujolin-Bellet (), Emmanuelle Begon, Véronique Perret () and Géraldine Schmidt ()
Additional contact information
Philippe Mairesse: UMR 8218 ACTE - Institut ACTE - Arts, Créations, Théories, Esthétiques - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Rachel Beaujolin-Bellet: IAE Paris - Sorbonne Business School
Emmanuelle Begon: ANACT - Agence Nationale d'Amélioration des Conditions de Travail - Anact, Lyon
Véronique Perret: DRM - Dauphine Recherches en Management - Université Paris Dauphine-PSL - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Géraldine Schmidt: GREGOR - Groupe de Recherche en Gestion des Organisations - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - IAE Paris - Sorbonne Business School

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Identity construction (IC) cannot be reduced to discourses, nor to individual responsibility. Alvesson & Wilmott (2002) suggest two main processes of identity construction : identity regulation (IR, the discursive practices of identity definition) and identity work (IW, the interpretive activities involved in reproduction of self-identity). Based on this dialogic conception of IC, we wonder whether artistic interventions could play a significant role in the IC process, especially through its ability to address the relational, sensible, emotional, and affective dimensions. In other words, our paper intends to better understand the role of experience and the embodiment of sensemaking in the dialogic process of identity construction. In this perspective, we will focus on cases where art interventions take place in working situations at some crucial moments of IC. Exploring the dimension of the sensible encapsulated in artworks and art interventions allows in particular to better grasp how collective understanding of organizations and their transformations hinge on subjectivity (Abrir 2012). This knowledge is generally recognized as disruptive, because of the heterogeneity of the two words of art and organization, the ability of art for ―not-knowing or more generally the ability of art and aesthetics for promoting contradictory emotions. The dimension of the sensible brought by art is characterized by its subjectification power and by its value sharing (the role of emotions and affects, the construction of subjectivity) and value-adding. Our argument is that art, by organizing the co-creation of work-related sensible forms, triggers and performs - in ways we strive at investigating - a collective and dialogic process between IR and IW.

Keywords: Identity Construction; Identity Work; Identity regulation; Art-based research (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013-07-03
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cbe
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00844185v1
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Published in EGOS 2013 Sub-theme 09: (SWG) Identity in Art, Design and Organization, Jul 2013, Montréal, Canada

Downloads: (external link)
https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00844185v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00844185

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().