Is Equilibrium in Transport Pure Nash, Mixed or Stochastic? Evidence from Laboratory Experiments

Vinayak Dixit (v.dixit@unsw.edu.au) and Laurent Denant-Boèmont
Additional contact information
Vinayak Dixit: rCITI - Research Centre for Integrated Transport Innovation (rCITI) - UNSW@ADFA - University of New South Wales - Australian Defence Force Academy - UNSW - University of New South Wales [Sydney]

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: The classical theory of transport equilibrium is based on the Wardrop's first principle that describes a Nash User Equilibrium (UE), where in no driver can unilaterally change routes to improve his/her travel times. A growing number of economic laboratory experiments aiming at testing Nash-Wardrop equilibrium have shown that the Pure Strategy Nash Equilibrium (PSNE) is not able to explain the observed strategic choices well. In addition even though Mixed Strategy Nash Equilibrium (MSNE) has been found to fit better the observed aggregate choices, it does not explain the variance in choices well. This study analyses choices made by users in three different experiments involving strategic interactions in endogenous congestion to evaluate equilibrium prediction. We compare the predictions of the PSNE, MSNE and Stochastic User Equilibrium (SUE). In SUE, the observed variations in choices are assumed to be due to perception errors. The study proposes a method to iteratively estimate SUE models on choice data with strategic interactions. Among the three sets of experimental data the SUE approach was found to accurately predict the average choices, as well as the variances in choices. The fact that the SUE model was found to accurately predict variances in choices, suggests its applicability for transport equilibrium models that attempt to evaluate reliability in transportation systems. This finding is fundamental in the effort to determining a behaviourally consistent paradigm to model equilibrium in transport networks. The study also finds that Fechner error which is the inverse of the scale parameter in the SUE model is affected by the group sizes and the complexity of the cost function. In fact, the larger group sizes and complexity of cost functions increased the variability in choices. Finally, from an experimental design standpoint we show that it is not possible to estimate a noise parameter associate to Fechner error in the case when the choices are equally probable. 2

Keywords: traffic equilibrium; stochastic user equilibrium; fechner error; scale parameter; Experimental economics (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-exp and nep-tre
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01103472
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Published in Transportation research. Part C, Emerging technologies, 2014, 48, pp.301-310. ⟨10.1016/j.trc.2014.09.002⟩

Downloads: (external link)
https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01103472/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01103472

DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2014.09.002

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD (hal@ccsd.cnrs.fr).