Meaningful Learning in Weighted Voting Games: An Experiment
Eric Guerci,
Nobuyuki Hanaki and
Naoki Watanabe ()
Additional contact information
Naoki Watanabe: Faculty of Engineering, Information and Systems [Tsukuba] - Université de Tsukuba = University of Tsukuba
Post-Print from HAL
Abstract:
By employing binary committee choice problems, this paper investigates how varying or eliminating feedback about payoffs affects: (1) subjects' learning about the underlying relationship between their nominal voting weights and their expected payoffs in weighted voting games; and (2) the transfer of acquired learning from one committee choice problem to a similar but different problem. In the experiment, subjects choose to join one of two committees (weighted voting games) and obtain a payoff stochastically determined by a voting theory. We found that: (i) subjects learned to choose the committee that generates a higher expected payoff even without feedback about the payoffs they received; and (ii) there was statistically significant evidence of ``meaningful learning'' (transfer of learning) only for the treatment with no payoff-related feedback. This finding calls for re-thinking existing models of learning to incorporate some type of introspection.
Keywords: experiment; voting game; learning; two-armed bandit problem (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017-02-02
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cdm, nep-exp, nep-gth and nep-pol
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01216244v1
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)
Published in Theory and Decision, 2017, 83 (10), pp.131-153. ⟨10.1007/s11238-017-9588-x⟩
Downloads: (external link)
https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01216244v1/document (application/pdf)
Related works:
Journal Article: Meaningful learning in weighted voting games: an experiment (2017) 
Working Paper: Meaningful Learning in Weighted Voting Games: An Experiment (2015) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01216244
DOI: 10.1007/s11238-017-9588-x
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().