From welfare to preferences, do decision flaws matter? The case of tuition fees

Guilhem Lecouteux and Leonard Moulin

Working Papers from HAL

Abstract: We investigate the relation between welfare and preference satisfaction in economics, and show that the extension of the scope of economic analysis through the 20th century forces economists to question the validity of the preference satisfaction criterion as a normative criterion for evaluating public policies. We then argue that welfare economists should clarify the normative content of this criterion in order to properly design public policies. We illustrate our point with the case of the selection at the entry of university, and show that, according to the normative criterion used by the social planner, the optimal policy radically changes. In particular, we argue that -- if we adopt a paternalistic conception of welfare -- it becomes necessary to establish a clear distinction between preference and welfare, and to integrate the different social and psychological biases that can influence the decision of the individuals in the design of public policies.

Keywords: preferences; welfare; prospect theory; tuition fees (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013-04-04
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cbe
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-00807687
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-00807687/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-00807687

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().