What Is the Best Risk Measure in Practice? A Comparison of Standard Measures
Suzanne Emmer,
Marie Kratz (kratz@essec.fr) and
Dirk Tasche
Additional contact information
Suzanne Emmer: CREAR - Center of Research in Econo-finance and Actuarial sciences on Risk / Centre de Recherche Econo-financière et Actuarielle sur le Risque - ESSEC Business School
Marie Kratz: ESSEC Business School, MAP5 - UMR 8145 - Mathématiques Appliquées Paris 5 - UPD5 - Université Paris Descartes - Paris 5 - INSMI-CNRS - Institut National des Sciences Mathématiques et de leurs Interactions - CNRS Mathématiques - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Dirk Tasche: Prudential Regulation Authority - Bank of England
Working Papers from HAL
Abstract:
Expected Shortfall (ES) has been widely accepted as a risk measure that is conceptually superior to Value-at-Risk (VaR). At the same time, however, it has been criticized for issues relating to backtesting. In particular, ES has been found not to be elicitable which means that backtesting for ES is less straight-forward than, e.g., backtesting for VaR. Expectiles have been suggested as potentially better alternatives to both ES and VaR. In this paper, we revisit commonly accepted desirable properties of risk measures like coherence, comonotonic additivity, robustness and elicitability. We check VaR, ES and Expectiles with regard to whether or not they enjoy these properties, with particular emphasis on Expectiles. We also consider their impact on capital allocation, an important issue in risk management. We find that, despite the caveats that apply to the estimation and backtesting of ES, it can be considered a good risk measure. In particular, there is no sufficient evidence to justify an all-inclusive replacement of ES by Expectiles in applications, especially as we provide an alternative way for backtesting of ES.
Keywords: Probability Integral Transform (PIT); Risk Measure; Backtesting; Coherence; Capital Allocation; Diversification; Elicitability; Expected Shortfall; Expectile; Forecasts; Risk Management; Robustness; Value-at-Risk (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013-12-20
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-rmg
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://essec.hal.science/hal-00921283
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (10)
Downloads: (external link)
https://essec.hal.science/hal-00921283/document (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-00921283
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD (hal@ccsd.cnrs.fr).