ECONOMETRIC METHODS FOR LAND USE MICROSIMULATION

Nathalie Picard and Constantinos Antoniou
Additional contact information
Constantinos Antoniou: NTUA - National Technical University of Athens [Athens]

Working Papers from HAL

Abstract: Typically, urban development models have been based on aggregate principles. UrbanSim (Waddell et al. 2003) is among a new breed of models that use microsimulation in an effort to overcome the limitations of earlier models and provide a more dynamic and detailed paradigm. The advantages and disadvantages of using microsimulation are not within the scope of this chapter, but the main implication is that more data, as well as more detailed ones are required for microsimulation than for aggregate models. In the context of the SustainCity project (http://www.sustaincity.org), three European cities (Brussels, Paris and Zürich, described in other chapters of this handbook) have been modelled using the land use microsimulation platform UrbanSim. This platform relies on various models interacting with each other, to predict long–term urban development. The aim of this chapter is to provide some econometric insight into this process. A common set of notations and assumptions are first defined, and the more common model structures (linear regression, multinomial logit, nested logit, mixed MNL and latent variable models) are described in a consistent way. Special treatments and approaches that are required due to the specific nature of the data in this type of applications (i.e. involving very large number of alternatives, and often exhibiting endogeneity, correlation, and (pseudo–)panel data properties) are discussed. For example, importance sampling, spatial econometrics, Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR) and endogeneity issues are covered. Specific examples of the following models: (i) household location choice model, (ii) jobs location/firmography, (iii) real estate price model, and (iv) land developmentmodel, are demonstrated in the context of the case studies in Brussels, Paris and Zürich. Finally, lessons learned in relation to the econometric models from these case studies are summarized.

Keywords: Discrete choice models; Model diagnostics; Data issues; Importance sampling; Heterogeneous preferences; Econometric models; Spatial econometrics models (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014-12-08
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-dcm and nep-ure
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-01092031
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-01092031/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-01092031

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().