Can the Seesaw Model Depict the Certainty Effect?
Marek Jenöffy ()
Additional contact information
Marek Jenöffy: Büro am Carlsplatz
Working Papers from HAL
Abstract:
The Signal-Preference Model (Seesaw Model) has provided an algorithm for modeling endogenous preferences using the insight of ancient rhetoric and the empirical results of communications research. It predicts how preferences form or can be altered. This paper examines how the Seesaw Model performs in the framework of economic decision theory. The results of the Seesaw Model are compared with Expected Utility Theory, Bayes, and Prospect Theory. I use empirical data gained with students of Humboldt University of Berlin as well as data from Kahneman and Tversky. Surprisingly this model of endogenous preferences does well in solving the certainty effect paradox and the reflection effect paradox. It may be considered that the Seesaw Model produces better results in predicting human decisions than traditional Expected Utility Theory or Prospect Theory. Additionally, the model can not only measure existing preferences but can also predict under which circumstances preferences can be altered.
Keywords: Information; Uncertainty; Preferences; Communication; Preference Formation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023-06-21
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-upt
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-04136569
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-04136569/document (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-04136569
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().