Consistent collective decisions under majorities based on differences

Mostapha Diss and Patrizia Pérez-Asurmendi ()

Working Papers from HAL

Abstract: The main criticism to the aggregation of individual preferences under majority rules refers to the possibility of reaching inconsistent collective decisions from the election process. In these cases, the collective preference includes cycles and even could prevent the election of any alternative as the collective choice. The likelihood of consistent outcomes under two classes of majority rules constitutes the aim of this paper. Specifically, we focus on majority rules that require certain consensus in individual preferences to declare an alternative as the winner. In the case of majorities based on difference of votes, such requirement asks to the winner alternative to obtain a difference in votes with respect to the loser alternative taken into account that individuals are endowed with weak preference orderings. Same requirement is asked to the restriction of these rules to individual linear preferences, whereas in the case of majorities based on difference in support, the requirement has to do with the difference in the sum of the intensities for the alternatives in contest.

Keywords: Majorities based on di fference of votes; Majorities based on diff erence in support; Probability Transitivity; Triple-acyclicity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014-02-11
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cdm and nep-pol
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00944687v1
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00944687v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Consistent collective decisions under majorities based on differences (2015)
Working Paper: Consistent collective decisions under majorities based on differences (2014)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-00944687

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().