Do Negative Emotions Explain Punishment in Power-to-Take Game Experiments?

Fabio Galeotti

Working Papers from HAL

Abstract: An important branch of economic research on emotions has used power-to-take game experiments to study the impact of negative emotions, such as anger, irritation and contempt, on the decision to punish. We investigate experimentally the role that the specific punishment technology adopted plays in this context, and test to what extent punishing behavior can be truly attributed to negative emotions. We find that a large part (around 70%) of the punishment behavior observed in previous PTTG studies is explained by the technology of punishment adopted instead of negative emotions. Once this effect is removed, negative emotions do still play an important role, but the efficiency costs associated to them are much smaller.

Keywords: Emotions; punish ment; power-to-take; experiment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cbe, nep-exp and nep-neu
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01128873v1
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (14)

Downloads: (external link)
https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01128873v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Do negative emotions explain punishment in power-to-take game experiments? (2015)
Working Paper: Do Negative Emotions Explain Punishment in Power-to-Take Game Experiments ? (2015)
Working Paper: Do Negative Emotions Explain Punishment in Power-to-Take Game Experiments (2015)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-01128873

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().