Biodiversity, Shapely Value and Phylogenetic Trees: Some Remarks
Hubert Stahn
Working Papers from HAL
Abstract:
This paper explores the main differences between the Shapley Values of a set of taxa introduced by Haake et al. [4] and Fuchs and Jin [3], the latter having been found identical to the Fair Proportion Index (Redding and Mooers [10]). In line with Shapley [13], we identify the cooperative game basis for each of these two classes of phylogenetic games and use them (i) to construct simple formulas for these two Shapley values and (ii) to compare these different approaches. Using the set of weights of a phylogenetic tree as a parameter space, we then discuss the conditions under which these two values coincide and, if they are not the same, revisit Hartman's [5] convergence result. Finally, we compare the species ranking induced by these two values. Considering the Kendal and the Spearman rank correlation coefficient, simulations show that these rankings are strongly correlated.
Keywords: biodiversity; phylogenetic trees; Shapley value; Fair Proportion index (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017-11
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-env and nep-gth
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01630069
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01630069/document (application/pdf)
Related works:
Working Paper: Biodiversity, Shapley value and phylogenetic trees: some remarks (2020)
Working Paper: Biodiversity, Shapely Value and Phylogenetic Trees: Some Remarks (2017)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-01630069
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD (hal@ccsd.cnrs.fr).