EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Meritocracy as a WEIRD Phenomenon: Fairness Reasoning and Redistributive Preferences across the World

Yuchen Huang () and Zhexun Mo ()
Additional contact information
Yuchen Huang: PSE - Paris School of Economics - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - ENS-PSL - École normale supérieure - Paris - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - ENPC - École nationale des ponts et chaussées - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement
Zhexun Mo: PSE - Paris School of Economics - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - ENS-PSL - École normale supérieure - Paris - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - ENPC - École nationale des ponts et chaussées - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement, WIL - World Inequality Lab

Working Papers from HAL

Abstract: Meritocratic redistributive preferences - where people regard it as more unfair and demand more redistribution, when the income difference is due to luck rather than effort - is often used as an implicit assumption in previous studies of redistributive preferences. We provide ample evidence from representative international survey datasets to demonstrate that meritocratic redistributive preference is a phenomenon particular to the Western, Educated, Rich, Industrialized and Democratic (WEIRD) countries, and to a narrower sense only Anglo-Saxon and Protestant European countries. We show that first of all, a robustly significant negative correlation between demand for redistribution and the perceived importance of efforts in determining income inequalities exists only in WEIRD countries. Secondly, not all sources of income inequalities out of human control are considered unfair: gender, racial and religious hierarchies are often considered fair inequalities which do not require redistribution in non-WEIRD countries, while family-wealth-based inequalities are universally denounced and should be redistributed. Finally, we also discuss the reasons on the formation of non-meritocratic preferences from two perspectives: heterogeneities in fairness views and government responsibilities across the world.

Keywords: Meritocracy; Fairness Preferences; Income Inequality; Beliefs; Redistribution; Government Duty (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022-06
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-inv
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-04129246v1
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://shs.hal.science/halshs-04129246v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-04129246

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-04129246