Understanding Conformity: An Experimental Investigation
B. Douglas Bernheim and
Christine L. Exley (clexley@hbs.edu)
Additional contact information
Christine L. Exley: Harvard Business School, Negotiation, Organizations & Markets Unit
No 16-070, Harvard Business School Working Papers from Harvard Business School
Abstract:
Some theories of conformity hold that social equilibrium either standardizes inferences or promotes a shared understanding of conventions and norms among individuals with fixed heterogeneous preferences (belief mechanisms). Others depict tastes as fluid and hence subject to social influences (preference mechanisms). Belief mechanisms dominate discussions of conformity within economics, but preference mechanisms receive significant attention in other social sciences. This paper seeks to determine whether conformity is attributable to belief mechanisms or preference mechanisms by exploiting their distinctive implications for the process of convergence. Laboratory experiments suggest that economists have focused too narrowly on explanations for conformity involving belief mechanisms.
Keywords: conformity; norms; image motivation; prosocial behavior (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 64 pages
Date: 2015-12
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cbe, nep-evo, nep-exp, nep-neu and nep-soc
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (22)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.hbs.edu/faculty/pages/download.aspx?name=16-070.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hbs:wpaper:16-070
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Harvard Business School Working Papers from Harvard Business School Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by HBS (workingpapers@hbs.edu).