Anomalies in Tournament Design: The Madness of March Madness

Robert Baumann (), Victor Matheson and Cara Howe
Additional contact information
Cara Howe: Department of Economics, College of the Holy Cross

No 912, Working Papers from College of the Holy Cross, Department of Economics

Abstract: Tournament design is of crucial importance in competitive sports. The primary goal of effective tournament design is to provide incentives for the participants to maximize their performance both during the tournament and in the time period leading up to the tournament. In spectator sports, a secondary goal of tournament design is to also promote interesting match ups that generate fan interest. Seeded tournaments, in general, promote both goals. Teams or individuals with strong performances leading up to a tournament receive higher seeds which increase their chances of progressing further in the tournament. Furthermore, seeding ensures that the strongest teams or players are most likely to meet in the final rounds of the tournament when fan interest is at its peak. Under some distributions of team or player skill, however, a seeding system can introduce anomalies that could affect incentives. Our analysis of the NCAA men’s basketball tournament uncovers such an anomaly. The seeding system in this tournament gives teams with better success in the regular season more favorable first round match ups, but the tournament is not reseeded as the games progress. Therefore, while higher seeds progress to the 2nd round of the tournament at uniformly higher rates than lower seeds, this relationship breaks down in later rounds. We find that 10th and 11th seeds average more wins and typically progress farther in the tournament than 8th and 9th seeds. This finding violates the intended incentive structure of seeded tournaments.

Keywords: basketball; tournament design; sports; NCAA (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D02 L83 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 16 pages
Date: 2009-10
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-lab and nep-spo
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Published in Journal of Quantitative Analysis of Sports, Vol. 6:2, March 2010, article 4.

Downloads: (external link)
https://hcapps.holycross.edu/hcs/RePEc/hcx/HC0912- ... ann_MarchMadness.pdf (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 404 Not Found

Related works:
Journal Article: Anomalies in Tournament Design: The Madness of March Madness (2010)
Working Paper: Anomalies in Tournament Design: The Madness of March Madness (2009)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hcx:wpaper:0912

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from College of the Holy Cross, Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Victor Matheson ().