Functionings, Capabilities and the 2010 Human Development Index

Eduardo Zambrano

No HDRP-2011-11, Human Development Research Papers (2009 to present) from Human Development Report Office (HDRO), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP)

Abstract: In 2010 the UNDP unveiled a new methodology for the calculation of the Human Development Index (HDI). In this paper I investigate the merits of this change by evaluating the tradeoffs between the core dimensions of wellbeing implied by the index and try to understand the extent to which those tradeoffs are problematic in light of the normative principles that the 2010 HDI is designed to satisfy. I also compare the rankings that ensue to those produced by alternatives brought forth by Ravallion (2010) building on work by Chakravarty (2003). In practice, all methodologies agree considerably in terms of how they rank countries, but when they differ, the 2010 HDI arguably produces results more consistent with what the HDI is intended to measure: human development and capabilities, as conceptualized by Sen (1985).

Keywords: Human Development Index; Capabilites (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D63 O15 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 46 pages
Date: 2011-11
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (12)

Published as background research for the 2011 Human Development Report.

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdr.undp.org/en/reports/global/hdr2011/papers/HDRP_2011_11.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hdr:papers:hdrp-2011-11

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Human Development Research Papers (2009 to present) from Human Development Report Office (HDRO), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by HDRO/UNDP ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).