Does Welfare Spending Crowd Out Charitable Activity? Evidence from Historical England under the Poor Laws

Nina Boberg-Fazlic and Paul Sharp

No 49, Working Papers from European Historical Economics Society (EHES)

Abstract: This paper examines the relationship between government spending and charitable activity. We present a novel way of testing the ‘crowding out hypothesis’, making use of the fact that welfare provision under the Old Poor Laws was decided on the parish level, thus giving the heterogeneity we need to test for the impact of different levels of welfare support within a single country. Using data on poor relief spending combined with data on charitable incomes by county for two years before and after 1800, we find a positive relationship: areas with more public provision also enjoyed higher levels of charitable income. These results are confirmed when instrumenting for Poor Law spending using the distance to London and historical migration to London, as well as when looking at first differences.

Keywords: Charity; crowding out hypothesis; England; Poor Laws (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: H5 I3 N3 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 30 pages
Date: 2013-11
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-his and nep-pke
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://ehes.org/wp/EHES_No49.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Does Welfare Spending Crowd Out Charitable Activity? Evidence from Historical England Under the Poor Laws (2017)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hes:wpaper:0049

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from European Historical Economics Society (EHES) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Paul Sharp ().