EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Gene Technology in the eyes of the public and experts. Moral opinions, attitudes and risk perception

Lennart Sjöberg ()
Additional contact information
Lennart Sjöberg: Center for Risk Research, Postal: Stockholm School of Economics, P.O. Box 6501, SE-113 83 Stockholm, Sweden

No 2004:7, SSE/EFI Working Paper Series in Business Administration from Stockholm School of Economics

Abstract: Risk perceptions and attitudes to genetically modified food (GMF) were investigated in a survey study of the public (N=469) and experts (N=49). The response rate was 47 percent for the public. For the experts, response rate was 60 percent. GMF technology was rated as the worst of 18 technologies by members of the public and highly replaceable. Experts had a very different view but also saw GMF as replaceable. Models of risk perceptions and attitudes with regard to policy and consumer intentions were fitted to data. It was found that a very large share of the variance, about 70 percent, was accounted for in the latter cases, while risk perception was somewhat harder to account for (about 50 percent was explained). Traditional explanatory factors such as Dread and Novelty were weak explanatory factors as compared to new approaches, which included Interfering with Nature, Moral value of technology and Epistemic trust. Experts were throughout much more positive to GMF than were members of the public. However, their attitudes and risk perceptions still showed dynamic properties similar to those found in the data from the public. The differences between experts and the public could be well explained in terms of the models tested. In comparisons with recent Eurobarometer studies of attitudes towards GMF, risk emerged in the present study as a more important factor in attitudes, equally important as benefits. The models formulated for the present data were about twice as powerful as those in published analyses of Eurobarometer data.

Keywords: Gene technology; risk perception; policy attitude; consumer behavior; experts; epistemic trust; risk sensitivity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 54 pages
Date: 2004-06-07, Revised 2005-05-11
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cbe
Note: http://www.dynam-it.com/lennart/pdf/genetically%20modified%20food%20article%20in%20rm.pdf
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Published in Risk Management: An International Journal, 2008, pages 168-193.

Downloads: (external link)
http://swoba.hhs.se/hastba/papers/hastba2004_007.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hhb:hastba:2004_007

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in SSE/EFI Working Paper Series in Business Administration from Stockholm School of Economics The Economic Research Institute, Stockholm School of Economics, P.O. Box 6501, SE 113 83 Stockholm, Sweden. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Helena Lundin ().

 
Page updated 2025-04-09
Handle: RePEc:hhb:hastba:2004_007