Is congestion pricing fair? Consumer and citizen perspectives on equity effects
Jonas Eliasson ()
No 2016:5, Working papers in Transport Economics from CTS - Centre for Transport Studies Stockholm (KTH and VTI)
Abstract:
This paper discusses and analyses whether congestion charges can be considered to be “fair” in different senses to the word. Two different perspectives are distinguished: the consumer perspective and the citizen perspective. The consumer perspective is the traditional one in equity analyses, and includes changes in travel costs, travel times and so on. Using data from four European cities, I show that highincome groups pay more than lowincome groups, but lowincome groups pay a larger share of their income. I argue that which of these distributional measures is most appropriate depends on the purpose(s) of the charging system. The citizen perspective is about individuals’ views of social issues such as equity, procedural fairness and environmental issues. I argue that an individual can be viewed as a “winner” from a citizen perspective if a reform (such as congestion pricing) is aligned with her views of what is socially desirable. Using the same data set, I analyse to what extent different income groups “win” or “lose” from a citizen perspective – i.e., to what extent congestion pricing is aligned with the societal preferences of high and lowincome groups. It turns out that these differences are small, but overall, middleincome groups “win” the most in this sense.
Keywords: Distributional effects; Equity effects; Consumer vs. citizen; Congestion charges; Congestion pricing; Fairness (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: R48 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 29 pages
Date: 2016-03-11
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-tre and nep-ure
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (25)
Published as Eliasson, Jonas, 'Is congestion pricing fair? Consumer and citizen perspectives on equity effects' in Transport Policy, 2016, pages 1-15.
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.transportportal.se/swopec/CTS2016-5.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
Journal Article: Is congestion pricing fair? Consumer and citizen perspectives on equity effects (2016) 
Working Paper: Is Congestion Pricing Fair?: Consumer and Citizen Perspectives on Equity Effects (2016) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hhs:ctswps:2016_005
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working papers in Transport Economics from CTS - Centre for Transport Studies Stockholm (KTH and VTI) Centrum för Transportstudier (CTS), Teknikringen 10, 100 44 Stockholm, Sweden.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CTS ().