Common ground for effort sharing? Preferred principles for distributing climate mitigation efforts

Mattias Hjerpe, Åsa Löfgren, Björn-Ola Linnér, Magnus Hennlock, Thomas Sterner and Sverker C. Jagers
Additional contact information
Mattias Hjerpe: Centre for Climate Science and Policy Research, Nya kåkenhus, Linköping University
Björn-Ola Linnér: Centre for Climate Science and Policy Research, Nya kåkenhus, Linköping University
Magnus Hennlock: Department of Economics, School of Business, Economics and Law, Göteborg University, Postal: Box 640, SE 40530 GÖTEBORG
Sverker C. Jagers: Social Science Division, Luleå University of Technology and Department of Political Science, University of Gothenburg, Postal: Box 640, SE 40530 GÖTEBORG

No 491, Working Papers in Economics from University of Gothenburg, Department of Economics

Abstract: This paper fills a gap in the current academic and policy literature concerning how parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change find common ground when distributing commitments and responsibilities to curb climate change. Preferred principles for sharing the effort to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions are compared among 170 delegates and more than 300 observers attending the UN Climate Conference in Copenhagen in December 2009. Respondents were asked to indicate their degree of support for eight effort-sharing principles for mitigation action. The survey results are analysed according to geographical region and party coalition affiliation. The results indicate that voluntary contribution, indicated as willingness to contribute, was the least preferred principle among both negotiators and observers. This could be seen as ironic, given that voluntary contribution is the guiding principle of the Copenhagen Accord. Across regions and party coalitions, agreement was strongest for basing a country’s mitigation level on its capacity to pay in terms of GDP per capita and on its historic greenhouse gas emissions since 1990.

Keywords: burden sharing; equity; climate change mitigation; Copenhagen; negotiating capacity/process; post-2012 negotiations (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q54 R50 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 33 pages
Date: 2011-02-25
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ene and nep-env
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
http://gupea.ub.gu.se/handle/2077/24706 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hhs:gunwpe:0491

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers in Economics from University of Gothenburg, Department of Economics Department of Economics, School of Business, Economics and Law, University of Gothenburg, Box 640, SE 405 30 GÖTEBORG, Sweden. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Jessica Oscarsson ().