Open Versus Closed Platforms

Joacim Tåg

No 747, Working Paper Series from Research Institute of Industrial Economics

Abstract: This paper studies an industry in which firms can choose to provide open or closed platforms. Open platforms, as opposed to closed, are extendable so third-party producers can develop extensions for them. Building on a two-sided market model, I show that firms might prefer to commit to keeping their platforms closed despite the fact that opening the platform is costless and open platforms are more valuable to consumers. The reason is that opening the platform may lead to intensified competition for consumers.

Keywords: Platforms; Software; Two-sided Markets (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D40 D42 D43 L10 L12 L13 L14 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 17 pages
Date: 2008-04-12, Revised 2008-08-28
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-com, nep-ipr, nep-pr~, nep-mic, nep-mkt and nep-net
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Communication & Strategies, 2009, pages 95-114.

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.ifn.se/Wfiles/wp/wp747.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Competing Platforms and Third Party Application Developers (2009)
Working Paper: Efficiency and the Provision of Open Platforms (2008)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hhs:iuiwop:0747

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Paper Series from Research Institute of Industrial Economics Research Institute of Industrial Economics, Box 55665, SE-102 15 Stockholm, Sweden. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Elisabeth Gustafsson ().