Defining the Role of Cognitive Distance in the Peer Review Process: Explorative Study of a Grant Scheme in Infection Biology
Qi Wang () and
Ulf Sandström
Additional contact information
Qi Wang: Department of Industrial Economics and Management, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Postal: Department of Industrial Economics and Management, Royal Institute of Technology, SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden
No 2014/10, INDEK Working Paper Series from Royal Institute of Technology, Department of Industrial Economics and Management
Abstract:
The aim of this paper is twofold: (1) to provide a methodology that can measure cognitive distance between researchers and (2) to explore the role of cognitive distance on the results of peer review processes. Citing references and the content of articles are used to represent their respective scientific knowledge bases. Based on the two different approaches—Author-Bibliographic Coupling analysis and Author-Topic analysis—we apply the methodology on a recent competition for grants from the Swedish Strategic Foundation. Results indicate that cognitive distances between applicants and reviewers might influence peer review results, but that the impact is to some extent at the unexpected end. The main contribution of this paper is the elaboration on the relevance of the concept of cognitive distance to the issue of research evaluation in general, and especially in relation to peer review as a model used in grant decisions.
Keywords: peer review; cognitive distance; cognitive bias (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I20 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 15 pages
Date: 2014-12-18
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cbe
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://static.sys.kth.se/itm/wp/indek/indekwp10.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hhs:kthind:2014_010
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in INDEK Working Paper Series from Royal Institute of Technology, Department of Industrial Economics and Management Department of Industrial Economics and Management, Royal Institute of Technology, SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Vardan Hovsepyan ().