Double-Blind in Light of Internet – Note on Review Processes

Hakan Holm

No 2009:5, Working Papers from Lund University, Department of Economics

Abstract: This paper analyses the credibility of author anonymity provided by double-blind review processes. It is argued that authors have strong incentives to disseminate information about their papers before publication. A sample from two economics journals, both using double-blind review processes provides evidence that author revealing information of most accepted papers is available on the Internet before the review processes are finished. The difficulty and cost of identifying authors of anonymized unpublished manuscripts are examined in an experiment where subjects are paid according to their identification performance. The vast majority of authors can be identified within 60 seconds.

Keywords: Review Process; Scientific Publication; Experiment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C91 D80 O30 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 39 pages
Date: 2009-04-19
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-hpe, nep-ore and nep-sog
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://project.nek.lu.se/publications/workpap/Papers/WP09_5.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hhs:lunewp:2009_005

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Lund University, Department of Economics School of Economics and Management, Box 7080, S-22007 Lund, Sweden. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Iker Arregui Alegria ().