The Nonequivalence of the Earnings and Dividends Approaches to Equity Valuation

Jack D. Stecher (jack.stecher@nhh.no)
Additional contact information
Jack D. Stecher: Dept. of Accounting, Auditing and Law, Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration, Postal: NHH , Department of Accounting, Auditing and Law, Helleveien 30, N-5045 Bergen, Norway

No 2006/1, Discussion Papers from Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Business and Management Science

Abstract: Accounting theory treats a wide class of equity valuation approaches as equivalent. For example, under clean surplus accounting, the earnings approach is viewed as identical to the discounted dividends approach. Empirical research, however, typically finds that the two valuation approaches do not predict market prices equally well. This paper offers a theoretical explanation for this apparent anomaly: expectations of discounted infinite sums (incomes, cash flows, or dividends) are undefined unless some restrictive probabilistic conditions hold. Without the usual stationarity and ergodicity assumptions, it may still be possible to estimate upper and lower bounds on such sums, but these bounds need not coincide. In such a setting, earnings and discounted dividends yield intervals of justifiable valuations, which intersect but need not coincide. Depending on the extent to which a firm is held by insiders, differences in the valuations that different formulae justify may not show up in market prices. This provides an explanation for two additional empirical puzzles. First, empirical studies detecting little incremental information in dividends over earnings may be predisposed toward this finding. Second, stronger apparent reactions to dividend omissions than to initiations may be an illusion.

Keywords: Equity Valuation; Residual Income; Dividends (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C65 D82 G12 M41 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 33 pages
Date: 2006-03-03
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-acc, nep-fin and nep-fmk
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/11250/164030 (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 404 Not Found (http://hdl.handle.net/11250/164030 [302 Found]--> https://www.unit.no/brage-denne-lenken-er-ikke-lenger-gyldig [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://sikt.no/brage-denne-lenken-er-ikke-lenger-gyldig)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hhs:nhhfms:2006_001

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Discussion Papers from Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Business and Management Science NHH, Department of Business and Management Science, Helleveien 30, N-5045 Bergen, Norway. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Stein Fossen (stein.fossen@nhh.no).