Does gender affect medical decisions? Results from a behavioral experiment with physicians and medical students

Geir Godager, Heike Hennig-Schmidt, Jing Jing Li, Jian Wang and Fan Yang
Additional contact information
Heike Hennig-Schmidt: BonnEconLab, University of Bonn, Germany
Jing Jing Li: Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, China
Jian Wang: Dong Fureng Institute of Economic and Social Development, Wuhan University, China
Fan Yang: Department of Health Management and Health Economics, Postal: Oslo, Norway

No 2021:1, HERO Online Working Paper Series from University of Oslo, Health Economics Research Programme

Abstract: It is rarely the case that differences in behaviors of females and males are described under a ceteris paribus condition, and behaviors can potentially be influenced by the environment in which decisions are made. In the case of medical decisions, physicians are expected to account for patient characteristics as well as observed and unobserved contextual factors, such as whether the patient has a healthy lifestyle. Since one usually do not randomize physicians to context, reported gender differences in medical practice can have several alternative interpretations.

A key question is whether the medical treatment of a given patient is expected to depend on the gender of the physician. To address this question, we quantify gender effects using data from an incentivized laboratory experiment, where Chinese medical doctors and Chinese medical students choose medical treatment under different payment schemes. We estimate preference parameters of females and males assuming decision-makers have patient-regarding preferences. We cannot reject the hypothesis that gender differences in treatment choices are absent. Preference parameters of females and males are not statistically different in a log-likelihood ratio test, and there is no evidence that the degree of randomness in choices differs between genders.

The absence of gender effects in the laboratory, where choice context is fixed, provides nuance to previous findings on gender differences, and highlights the general difficulty of separating individuals’ behavior from the context they are in.

Keywords: Gender; Laboratory experiment; Bounded rationality; Physician behavior (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C92 D82 H40 I11 J33 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 20 pages
Date: 2021-02-22
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cbe, nep-cna, nep-exp, nep-gen and nep-hrm
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.med.uio.no/helsam/forskning/nettverk/h ... blisering_1_2021.pdf Full text (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hhs:oslohe:2021_001

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in HERO Online Working Paper Series from University of Oslo, Health Economics Research Programme HERO / Department of Health Management and Health Economics P.O. Box 1089 Blindern, N-0317 Oslo, Norway. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Kristi Brinkmann Lenander ().