Is China Different? A Meta-Analysis of China’s Financial Sector Development

Christer Ljungvall (clj.int@cbs.dk) and Patrik Tingvall
Additional contact information
Christer Ljungvall: Copenhagen Business School

No 185, Ratio Working Papers from The Ratio Institute

Abstract: We examine whether China has benefited more than other countries from financial sector development by performing a meta-analysis of the relevant literature covering a large number of countries at different stages of development. Although the results for China are inconclusive, they indicate the absence of a direct link between financial development and economic growth.

Keywords: meta-analysis; financial sector development; economic growth; China (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: F43 G20 O11 O53 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 10 pages
Date: 2012-02-17
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-fdg and nep-tra
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8)

Downloads: (external link)
http://ratio.se/app/uploads/2014/11/cl_pt_is-china-different_185.pdf (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 404 Not Found (http://ratio.se/app/uploads/2014/11/cl_pt_is-china-different_185.pdf [308 Permanent Redirect]--> https://ratio.se/app/uploads/2014/11/cl_pt_is-china-different_185.pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Is China different? A meta-analysis of China's financial sector development (2013)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hhs:ratioi:0185

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Ratio Working Papers from The Ratio Institute The Ratio Institute, P.O. Box 5095, SE-102 42 Stockholm, Sweden. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Martin Korpi (martin.korpi@ratio.se).