”How much is enough?” Determining Adequate Levels of Environmental Compensation for Wind Power Impacts using Equivalency Analysis: An Illustrative & Hypothetical Case Study of Sea Eagle Impacts at the Smøla Wind Farm, Norway

Scott Cole ()
Additional contact information
Scott Cole: CERE, Centre for Environmental and Resource Economics, Postal: Swedish Univ. of Agricultural Sciences, S-901 83 Umeå, Sweden, http://www.cere.se

No 2011:4, CERE Working Papers from CERE - the Center for Environmental and Resource Economics

Abstract: Environmental considerations at wind power require avoidance and mitigation of environmental impacts through proper citing, operational constraints, etc. However, some impacts are unavoidable for otherwise socially-beneficial projects. Criteria for Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) suggest that compensation be provided for unavoidable or residual impacts on species and/or habitat from wind power development. Current environmental compensation schemes for wind power fail to demonstrate a connection between the expected ecological damage and the ecological gains through restoration. The EU-funded REMEDE project developed quantitative methods known as "equivalency analysis" to assist in scaling environmental compensation. This study provides a framework for estimating compensation at wind facilities based on the REMEDE approach. I illustrate the approach with a hypothetical case study involving sea eagle impacts at the Smøla Wind Farm (Norway). I quantify the damage (debit) from sea eagle turbine collisions and scale a compensatory project (credit) that reduces eagle mortality from power line electrocution, which is quantified using hypothetical data. The framework is generalizable to on- and off-shore wind development but requires targeted and thoughtful data collection. Importantly, compensation should not be used disingenuously to justify otherwise environmentally costly projects.

Keywords: Equivalency Analysis; environmental compensation; wind power (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: K32 Q42 Q51 Q57 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 50 pages
Date: 2011-03-03
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-agr, nep-ene, nep-env and nep-law
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www-sekon.slu.se/~gbost/CERE_WP2011-4.pdf (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 500 Can't connect to www-sekon.slu.se:80 (A connection attempt failed because the connected party did not properly respond after a period of time, or established connection failed because connected host has failed to respond.)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hhs:slucer:2011_004

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CERE Working Papers from CERE - the Center for Environmental and Resource Economics
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Mona Bonta Bergman ().