Is forest sequestration at the expense of bioenergy and forest products cost-effective in EU climate policy to 2050?

Miriam Munnich Vass () and Katarina Elofsson
Additional contact information
Miriam Munnich Vass: Department of Economics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Postal: Department of Economics, Box 7013, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden, http://www.slu.se/ekonomi

No 2013:9, Working Paper Series from Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department Economics

Abstract: Forest management affects the quantity of CO2 emissions in the atmosphere by carbon sequestration in standing biomass, carbon storage in forest products and production of bioenergy that replace fossil fuels. The main question in this paper is whether forest sequestration is worth increasing at the expense of bioenergy and forest products to achieve EU’s emission reduction target to 2050 cost-effectively. The assessment is based on numerical calculations using a dynamic, partial equilibrium model of cost-effective solutions, where three abatement methods in the forest sector are included together with abatement in the fossil fuel sector. The results show that forest sequestration in standing biomass is cost-effective compared to bioenergy. When sequestration is taken into account, net present costs for meeting EU carbon targets can be reduced by 18%. This is achieved through an increase in annual carbon sequestration by 30-158 million ton CO2. The overall cost of reaching the 80 per cent carbon reduction target amounts to 2,002 billion Euros when sequestration is included in the policy, but increases to 2,371 billion Euros without sequestration. Results suggest that forests can serve as a cost-efficient carbon sink over the considered time period.

Keywords: Forest carbon sequestration; bioenergy; cost-effectiveness; dynamic partial equilibrium; EU climate policy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q23 Q52 Q54 Q58 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 64 pages
Date: 2013-11-22
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-agr, nep-ene and nep-env
Note: The paper can be downloaded from the following website: http://pub.epsilon.slu.se/10903/
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.slu.se/Documents/externwebben/nl-fak/e ... xpense_Munnich.M.pdf (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 404 Not Found

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hhs:slueko:2013_009

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Paper Series from Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department Economics Department of Economics, Box 7013, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Elizabeth Hillerius ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).