From Research Project to Research Portfolio: Meeting Scale and Complexity

Jonathan Linton () and Nicholas Vonortas ()
Additional contact information
Jonathan Linton: Institute for Statistical Studies and Economics of Knowledge, National Research University — Higher School of Economics (Russia), and University of Ottawa (Canada)
Nicholas Vonortas: George Washington University, United States; State University of Campinas, Brazil

Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), 2015, vol. 9, issue 2, 38-43

Abstract: The article considers how the past and present tendency to focus on selecting the best projects based on the sole criterion of meritorious science may result in a sub-optimal portfolio. The authors argue that scientists need to proactively engage in the discussion over the need to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of societal investments to ensure that the next generation of the management and decision-making process for our science, technology and innovation system is rooted in sound principles. The classic peer review process tends to provide unintended overlap and allows for an ill fit between some of the pieces and unwanted gaps to occur. Areas of high risk and high return can be missed due to their controversial nature and split decisions typically resulting in negative funding decisions. In general, high risk and a high frequency of split decisions tend to be replaced with lower risk initiatives. The authors propose herein supplementing peer review with research portfolio evaluation approaches and decision-making tools that can better assess research uncertainties and other special features of the transformation of the resulting knowledge into improved social well-being. A coupling of research quality review by peers with more systematic portfolio meta-analysis of recommended projects is both possible and essential.

Keywords: research and development (R&D); peer review of R&D projects; project portfolio; portfolio-based approach; research performance evaluation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O20 O21 O31 O32 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://foresight-journal.hse.ru/data/2015/06/30/1082517310/03-Linton.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hig:fsight:v:9:y:2015:i:2:p:38-43

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015) from National Research University Higher School of Economics
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Nataliya Gavrilicheva () and Mikhail Salazkin ().