EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The concept of “comity” in Ulrich Huber’s conflict doctrine

Irina Getman-Pavlova ()
Additional contact information
Irina Getman-Pavlova: National Research University Higher School of Economics

HSE Working papers from National Research University Higher School of Economics

Abstract: This article investigates the concept of “comity”, discussed by Ulrich Huber (Dutch scholar of the XVIIth century). This author is the most typical representative of the Dutch theory of the conflict of law. Huber’s writings primarily reflected the doctrine of comity, which is the basis of the Dutch school statutes. This article concludes that all Huber’s axioms have entered modern doctrine and court practice (especially in common law countries). Huber is the founder of the “national theory” of conflict rules and, at the same time, the founder of “international theory” in the private international law

Keywords: private international law; doctrine; theory of the statutes; the Netherlands (the Dutch); Dutch school of conflict law XVIIth century; Ulrich Huber; international comity; positivism; pragmatism. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: K40 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 21 pages
Date: 2013
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-hpe and nep-law
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in WP BRP Series: Law/ LAW, November 2013, pages 1-21

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.hse.ru/data/2013/03/27/1295682692/13LAW2013.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hig:wpaper:13/law/2013

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in HSE Working papers from National Research University Higher School of Economics
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Shamil Abdulaev () and Shamil Abdulaev ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-30
Handle: RePEc:hig:wpaper:13/law/2013