Bank Capital Structure and Financial Innovation: Antagonists or Two Sides of the Same Coin?

Lorenzo Sasso ()

HSE Working papers from National Research University Higher School of Economics

Abstract: This article examines the challenges to banking capital regulation posed by ongoing financial innovation through regulatory capital arbitrage. On the one hand, such practice undermines the quality of regulatory capital, eroding prudential capital standards, but most importantly it creates a distortion in the regulatory capital ratio measures, which prevents investors and regulators from identifying the bank’s real underlying risks. Opportunities for regulatory capital arbitrage arise as a consequence of the inherent mismatch of accounting goals, corporate law and prudential regulation – all interacting with the notion of capital for banks. On the other hand, financial innovation is the result of banks’ risk-management policies. In order to reduce the cost of capital and compliance banks engage in derivatives, structured finance and hybrid instruments, altering the risk/return of their cash flow and the information released to the market for disclosure. In a way, regulation is the solution but also part of the problem. For this reason, new regulation strategies for banks need to be implemented. Systemic risk and balance-sheet risk need to be tackled respectively with macro- and micro-prudential regulation. This would involve an international harmonization of the accounting standards and individualised capital adequacy requirements for banks. The regulation has to be functional for the market under examination. The regulator should therefore consider the adoption of prudential filters to make static variables such as accounting rules, which are normally focused on evaluation, more dynamic to give banks some financial flexibility in their risk-management policies.

Keywords: Regulatory capital arbitrage; hybrid financial instruments; capital adequacy requirements; micro-prudential regulation; risk management; fair value accounting; IAS 32, IAS 39. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Z (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 32 pages
Date: 2016
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-acc, nep-ban, nep-ino and nep-rmg
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Published in WP BRP Series: Law / LAW, April 2016, pages 1-32

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.hse.ru/data/2016/04/19/1129446921/66LAW2016.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Bank Capital Structure and Financial Innovation: Antagonists or Two Sides of the Same Coin? (2016)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hig:wpaper:66/law/2016

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in HSE Working papers from National Research University Higher School of Economics
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Shamil Abdulaev () and Shamil Abdulaev ().