The Functional Method as the Staple of Comparative Studies of European Legal History in the Early 21st Century?

Dmitry Poldnikov (dpoldnikov@hse.ru)
Additional contact information
Dmitry Poldnikov: National Research University Higher School of Economics

HSE Working papers from National Research University Higher School of Economics

Abstract: The Europeanization of legal scholarship and legal education facilitates the emergence of comparative legal science as a promising new tool to discover similarities and differences between two or more jurisdictions and their past development. Yet, the specific methodology of such studies is still not clear. Some legal historians hold that comparative legal history does not or should not have its own methodology other than that of comparative law. Others warn against imposing a contemporary agenda and toolbox on legal history. The author of this article aims to clarify this debate by examining the prospect of applying one of the most popular methods of comparative law – the functional method – to the domain of legal history. On the basis of several examples from the European legal past he claims that examining the functions (the social purpose) of legal norms can help legal historians in three ways: first, to determine the objects of comparison and the sources of analysis, despite the variety of verbal shortcuts (the initial stage of research); second, to analyse legal norms from the perspective of solving social problems in the past – to study the 'law in action'; and third, to arrange the results of the research according to meaningful criteria at the final stage

Keywords: comparative legal history; methodology; functional method; European legal tradition; tertium comparationis; praesumptio similitudinis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: K10 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 13 pages
Date: 2018
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-his and nep-law
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Published in WP BRP Series: Law / LAW, February 2018, pages 1-13

Downloads: (external link)
https://wp.hse.ru/data/2018/02/21/1165235785/79LAW2018.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hig:wpaper:79/law/2018

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in HSE Working papers from National Research University Higher School of Economics
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Shamil Abdulaev (sabdulaev@hse.ru) and Shamil Abdulaev (sabdulaev@hse.ru).