ARE CAPITAL AND LABOR INPUTS PROPERLY MEASURED IN CHINA?

Zhan Li

No DP19-006, SSPJ Discussion Paper Series from Service Sector Productivity in Japan: Determinants and Policies, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University

Abstract: We first follow the standard approaches (OECD, 2001) to measure capital and labor services in China during the time period of 1980-2016 using the China Industrial Productivity database, and then investigate the influences of replacing factors services with their stocks, which is often adopted in current studies, on total factor productivity (TFP) growth. We also investigate the resource reallocations and their impacts on TFP growth, and further trace their industry origins. The results show that by taking quality changes into account, the annual growth rates of capital service and labor service are 12.30% and 3.56%, respectively. The economy-wide capital quality declines by 3.68% while labor quality increases by 34.10%. Consequently, the aggregate TFP growth of China is underestimated by 6.58% when only replacing capital service with capital stock, while it is overestimated by 50% when only replacing labor service with labor stock and is overestimated by 43.42% when replacing both capital and labor services with their stocks. There are barriers to factor mobility that cause resources misallocation in China, which could be corrected by following market mechanisms. The net reallocation of capital and labor contributes 60.53% to the aggregate TFP growth. Industries with high (or low) factor input growth and high (or low) factor service price contribute to the improvement of factor allocation while those with high (or low) factor input growth and low (or high) factor service price are responsible for the negative reallocation of factor inputs.

Keywords: Inputs services; Inputs quality; Aggregate production possibility frontier; China Industrial Productivity database; Resource reallocation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C82 O11 O47 O53 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 22 pages
Date: 2020-03
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cna, nep-eff and nep-tra
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://hermes-ir.lib.hit-u.ac.jp/hermes/ir/re/31216/DP19-006.pdf

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hit:sspjdp:dp19-006

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in SSPJ Discussion Paper Series from Service Sector Productivity in Japan: Determinants and Policies, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Digital Resources Section, Hitotsubashi University Library ().